I use Roon by itself currently and do not do any upsampling as my DAC does this as part of its processing. Please discuss the sonic differences experienced by adding HQ Player to Roon. This signal is feed out of the server to the DAC and the T+A also uses a completely different signal path for DSD, which was developed in house. Also I would have preferred to use Roon completely by itself.īy the way, all digital files get up-sampled to DSD512/48 which is 24.6 Mhz. I actually was hoping that I could no longer hear a difference because HQPlayer is more demanding on my hardware so I was hoping to be able to stop using it. They are close but it became apparent quickly that HQPlayer was a bit fuller, a bit more detailed all in all a bit more musical and more enjoyable. With Roon 1.8 they made it much easier to switch zones back and forth and therefore it was fairly easy to compare Roon to Roon with HQPlayer. Of course within the HQPlayer software you setup the DAC drivers to use and what filters you like, etc. I setup HQPlayer as a zone (or whatever they currently call it in Roon). I use Roon controller on my Microsoft Surface. I use HQPlayer and Roon Core on my PC server.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |